Friday, February 18, 2011

How did people Used to communicate before the internet, Email, Telephone was invented?(Long article)?

I am doing a project and i need to know How people used to communicate back then.It needs to be very long.2 pages or less? What did they use?What are the advantages and disadvantages? Was it hard to do? What could go wrong and so.Thanks. You can search up online and give me a large article??

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hi there...

good question & also good topic have been chosen by yours.. however, unfortunately to say, u dont have effort to find and make research bout your topic... so, i just give some hints and tips for your inquiry...

First, grab some good understanding on the term of 'communication'....what do you know about communication? what is the main point for people to communicate? moreover, what is differentation between interaction and communication?

2nd, how people used to communicate before the telecommunication or related technology was invented and founded, by Alexander graham bell or etc..
-> during ancient, there are many ways people to communicate
-> by animal and bird... buddy, think why traditional word using a term like pigeon hole...?
-> by flowing element, putting a written pulp into floating item, like bottle..
-> by oral, from ear to ear
-> by messenger,
-> by arrangement of star on the sky .
-> by the signage of universe, example; season changes, or during moonlight
-> during revolution
-> telegraph
-> morse code
-> messenger
20th century, the telecommunication technology was expanded and enhanced from time to time, due to several factors, such as, time, money, and data...

*sorry if i wrong, and correct me for the better knowledge.. just doing for the community, telling what i know, and seeking, obtaining and learning for the new knowledge and information...

Name the three ways that an ingredient can be measured and give one example for each way?

Hello there..

Actually, just wondering what is the state or form of an ingredient to be measured? Solid, Fluid or Gases? Also what do you want to measure from an ingredient, whether it's composition, it's physical attributes, it's taste or what? Sorry, just confusing.. U should specified what is the ingredient that u want to measure..? Is it the ingredient of meals or what? However, i'll try to give some views and words regarding your question with my my best of mine. Sorry if my answer can't comfort your question.

Basically, an ingredient can be formed into three state which on solid, fluid and gases. Thus, an ingredient can be measured depends on the particle, bonding, and reaction between others. So, for measuring of an ingredient can be done with some ways such as observation of their physical movement, changes their state to other form due to reaction with other substance, the number of atom, their chemical equation, etc

So, from some data or information of an ingredient, we can determine the way to be measured, what the apparatus or medium can be used to interpret for us bout the ingredient whether bout the substance, their characteristic, their bonding etc,

some ways to be measured an ingredient in generally depends on what the output u want

1). feel it; sweet, sour, or bitter? we can verbally saying that is so sweet, but in fact we can't describe and mindless for what is the level of sugar@honey in our drinks although knowing how much of sugar is taken to our drinks. furthermore, if my grandma or my mum tell me that half cup of spoon for coffee and two cup of spoon for sugar can have a good coffee, but still can't have the coffee like my mum making, my mum also still can't have the coffee like my grandma making, and we also can't have the coffee like we make and have yesterday. That's is so hard to tell, but reality, this is
one of our disability. unfortunately, we can't tell what is the ingredient of the something without noticed or labeled for the composition of the ingredient in the somethings. We expert on words, but worst on numbers.

2). taste it ; measured by delicious or not the meals that prepared for us. Unfortunately, how about people having flu to try the meals..?

3). hold it ; for weight, measured by the availability to pick up; just 2 options, able or not. So, We can't give the mass or weight of an ingredient by kilos or gram, if can, only just making prediction and probability, depends on the exp we have been through or passed before.

4). observe it ; just can say; small or big, narrow or wide, long or short but can't tell if big, what is the volume, or what is the dimension.?

I just give some ways how the human is measuring the ingredient. i'm not to dispute the human as i'm also a human, but just highlighting of human beings and the needs of assisted by other media. Like terms said that; can having as to be thinking, be nothing as to or to be disability. So, if we think, when we talk about our weight, our height as be measured viewing/observing physically and our blood pressure or our diabetes as be measured by equipped with instruments/tools/equipments and why describing our weight, height, blood pressure or diabetel level, we have been told, noticed or listed by numbering with a unit?

So, an ingredient can measured by the composition. For example, the ingredient of bread, easily we can listing the ingredient that been used in the bread, but hardly obtaining the quantity of each composition; flour;yeast;water;sugar of the ingredient baking a bread. Also, why we can't have a similar bread that we bought in the bakery shop with the same taste, size and weight even though we just got the recipe of baking the bread from the baker who bakes the bread in that bakery shop. Moreover, we also can't give the weight of bread when we take on the plate or from a bunch of bread,
just give more examples, how much sugar used in a tin of coco cola, how much water been used, how much ajinomoto used,

theoretically, we can measure an ingredient by calculating the composition that been used mathematically or chemically if we have all information of that ingredient.

we also can measure an ingredient by experimenting the composition after having some research and doing feasibilities. we can measure an ingredient by observing any reaction, any changes etc after manipulated or be manipulate with/not mix/stir/etc a catalyst.

So, we can measure the ingredient with a instrument depends on the state or form of the ingredient. i don't think my words can be your answer or not. please me, anybody corrects me if i'm wrong, tell me if i don't know, teach me if i don't understand, Hopefully, can contribute and give something to you, even though only can literate you with a word. last, but not least, without a word, no sentence can be formed.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Interaksi, Komunikasi Serta Informasi Adalah Pengetahuan...


Since the very beginning of civilization, communication has been an integral part of the growth of any species. Prehistoric men usually used gestures and sounds for communicating. These sounds were usually picked up from nature or other animals. But, humans started civilizing, a need for more elaborate way of communication was felt and newer methods were adopted by these early men. But till today, it is not totally clear that how did people communicate in the past?

Drawings and paintings were the first forms of communication adopted by early men. During the latter part of the Paleolithic age, people started using pictures for depicting stories of hunting and natural processes. Gradually a system was developed containing pictures for the depiction of ideas and common objects. This system is called pictographic writing. These pictures played an important part in religious rites.
Pictographic writing was found wanting when unusual words had to be depicted. This led to each symbol being represented as a sound rather than an idea or object. This paved the way for the development of spoken language. Drumbeats, smoke and fires were used for sending signals to long distances. With the development of writing, messages could be exchanged over distant places and they could be stored for being used later on. With this invention, the prehistoric era came to an end.

If you want to know how did people communicate in the past? Visiting the caves of early men would be the place to start. Paintings were made on ceilings and rock walls of these caves by the elders of the group. Pictures were usually made of objects, and wild animals like bison, horses, and deer. Drawings having human depiction are rare with most of them being schematic in nature. Yellow and red ochre, charcoal, manganese oxide and hematite were used for drawing these pictures. It is believed that the shaman (a respected elderly person) used to go into the caves for the purpose of transcribing their visions on cave walls, usually under the influence of some natural hallucination causing substance.

Images inscribed on rock during the prehistoric era are termed as petroglyphs. They were the most important form of communication before symbol writing began. These images had deep religious and cultural significance. Geoglyphs were drawings made on ground by arranging stones, gravel or stone fragments accordingly. The motivation behind making these drawings was usually religious. Such drawings which have been found across various continents seem to have an amazingly common style. This says that these images often flash into a human brain, thus explaining the similarity in styles.
All the speculation which is made about how did people communicate in the past? This can never be substantiated enough because not much material evidence is available for proving these beliefs. The human civilization has traveled a long distance from transmitting signals through successively lit bonfires to modern methods of communication. But, as far as the area of communication is concerned, one can never say that the history is complete.

Communicating information always has been extremely important. Throughout history, some information has had value beyond measure. The lack of information often costs huge amounts of money and, sometimes, many lives
.One example of this took place near New Orleans, Louisiana. Britain and the United States were fighting the War of Eighteen Twelve. The Battle of New Orleans is a famous battle. As in all large battles, hundreds of troops were killed or wounded.

After the battle, the Americans and the British learned there had been no need to fight. Negotiators for the United States and Britain had signed a peace treaty in the city of Ghent, Belgium, two weeks earlier. Yet news of the treaty had not reached the United States before the opposing troops met in New Orleans. The battle had been a terrible waste. People died because information about the peace treaty traveled so slowly.

From the beginning of human history, information traveled only as fast as a ship could sail. Or a horse could run. Or a person could walk. People experimented with other ways to send messages. Some people tried using birds to carry messages. Then they discovered it was not always a safe way to send or receive information.

A faster method finally arrived with the invention of the telegraph. The first useful telegraphs were developed in Britain and the United States in the eighteen thirties. The telegraph was the first instrument used to send information using wires and electricity. The telegraph sent messages between two places that were connected by telegraph wires. The person at one end would send the information. The second person would receive it.

Each letter of the alphabet and each number had to be sent separately by a device called a telegraph key. The second person would write each letter on a piece of paper as it was received. Here is what it sounds like. For our example we will only send you three letters: VOA. We will send it two times. Listen closely. In the eighteen fifties, an expert with a telegraph key could send about thirty-five to forty words in a minute. It took several hours to send a lot of information. Still, the telegraph permitted people who lived in cities to communicate much faster. Telegraph lines linked large city centers. The telegraph soon had a major influence on daily life.

The telegraph provided information about everything. Governments, businesses and individuals used the telegraph to send information. At the same time, newspapers used the telegraph to get information needed to tell readers what was happening in the world. Newspapers often were printed four or five times a day as new information about important stories was received over the telegraph. The telegraph was the quickest method of sending news from one place to another.On August fifth, eighteen fifty-eight, the first message was transmitted by a wire cable under the Atlantic Ocean. The wire linked the United States and Europe by telegraph. This meant that a terrible mistake like the battle of New Orleans would not happen again.

Reports of daily news events in Europe began to appear in American newspapers. And news of the United States appeared in European newspapers. Information now took only a matter of hours to reach most large cities in the world. This was true for the big cities linked by the telegraph. However, it was different if you lived in a small farming town, kilometers away from a large city. The news you got might be a day or two late. It took that long for you to receive your newspaper. On November second, nineteen twenty, radio station KDKA in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania broadcast the first radio program. That broadcast gave the results of a presidential election.

Within a few short years, news and information could be heard anywhere a radio broadcast could reach. Radios did not cost much. So most people owned at least one radio. Radio reporters began to speak to the public from cities where important events were taking place. Political leaders also discovered that radio was a valuable political tool. It permitted them to talk directly to the public. If you had a radio, you did not have to wait until your newspaper arrived. You could often hear important events as they happened.

Some people learned quickly that information meant power. In the nineteen thirties, many countries began controlling information. The government of Nazi Germany is a good example. Before and during World War Two, the government of Nazi Germany controlled all information the German people received. The government controlled all radio broadcasts and newspapers. The people of Germany only heard or read what the government wanted them to hear or read. It was illegal for them to listen to a foreign broadcast.

After World War Two, a new invention appeared -- television. In industrial nations, television quickly became common in most homes. Large companies were formed to produce television programs. These companies were called networks. Networks include many television stations linked together that could broadcast the same program at the same time. Most programs were designed to entertain people. There were movies, music programs and game programs. However, television also broadcast news and important information about world events. It broadcast some education programs, too. The number of radio and television stations around the world increased. It became harder for a dictator to control information.

In the nineteen fifties, two important events took place that greatly affected the communication of information. The first was a television broadcast that showed the East Coast and the West Coast of the United States at the same time. A cable that carried the pictures linked the two coasts. So people watching the program saw the Pacific Ocean on the left side of the screen. They saw the Atlantic Ocean on the right side of the screen. It was not a film. People could see two reporters talk to each other even though a continent separated them. Modern technology made this possible.

The other event happened on September twenty-fifth, nineteen fifty-six. That was when the first telephone cable under the Atlantic Ocean made it possible to make direct telephone calls from the United States to Europe. Less than six years later, in July, nineteen sixty-two, the first communications satellite was placed in orbit around the Earth. The speed of information greatly increased again. By the year nineteen hundred, big city newspapers could provide people with information that was only hours old. Now, both radio and television, with the aid of satellite communications, could provide information immediately. People who lived in a small village could listen to or watch world events as they happened.

A good example is when American astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first person to walk on the moon. Millions of people around the world watched as he carefully stepped onto the moon on July twentieth, nineteen sixty-nine. People in large cities, small towns and villages saw the event as it was happening. There was no delay in communicating this important information.

A few years after Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon, the United States Department of Defense began an experiment. That experiment led to a system that could send huge amounts of information around the world in seconds. Experts called it the beginning of the Information Age. The story of that experiment will be our report next week on EXPLORATIONS.


Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Tersirat di sebalik tersurat........

From
Anak muda
Feb 7, 11
1:03pm
Malaysiakini.com

Kami adalah golongan muda yang membesar di bawah kepimpinan Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Dahulunya kami mengenali Tun sekadar sebagai Dr M.


Bahkan pernah pada suatu ketika, Perdana Menteri pada kami, hanyalah Tun sahaja. Sewaktu kami membesar, mungkin Tun lah orang pertama yang memperkenalkan kepada kepada perkataan-perkataan seperti 'mega', 'wawasan', 'visi', 'yang pertama' dan sebagainya.

Walaupun kita tidak pernah sampai ke Everest, namun semangat kami pernah bersama-sama menawan puncak dunia. Walaupun kami tidak pernah berlayar mengelilingi dunia, namun semangat kita pernah bersama-sama mengiringi Jalur Gemilang merentas lautan dan benua.

Dari segi umur, Tun boleh dianggap sebagai abang kepada Datuk Seri Nik Aziz Nik Mat. Kami pula ialah cucu kepada Tun dan Tok Guru.

Usia kami jauh berbeza, pengalaman kita juga tidak setara. Kami mungkin tidak sempat melalui zaman-zaman sejarah lalu yang ditempuh oleh Tun dan Tok Guru, dan seolah-olah tidak layak berhujah dengan Tun.

Namun kami merasakan kami perlu bangkit menyatakan pendapat kami selaku golongan yang akan mewarisi kepimpinan negara daripada Tun dan Tok Guru pada suatu ketika nanti.

Tun seorang yang bijak, lalu Tun suruh rakyat membaca, dan kami pun membaca. Pepatah pun ada mengatakan, banyak membaca , luas pengetahuan. Dan syukur kepada Allah, kami tidak rugi daripada membaca dan mencari kefahaman.

Tulisan ini bukan untuk menyokong mana-mana pihak. Sebagai pihak ketiga, kami keliru pada mulanya apabila Tun mendakwa bahawa Tun menegakkan Islam, dan Tok Guru juga berdakwah memperjuangkan Islam.

Namun mengapakah tidak ada titik pertemuan?

Ada angin, ada pokoknya. Pastinya ada perbezaan yang nyata yang membezakan Tun dan Tok Guru, dan pasti salah seorang berkata benar kerana mesej Islam yang dibawa oleh Rasulullah hanyalah satu, dan semua Nabi dan Rasul termasuk Adam, Ibrahim, Musa dan Isa sebelum baginda membawa mesej Islam yang sama.

Seruan-seruan kepimpinan Tun nampak hebat, tapi kami mendapati ia tidak lengkap. Kami sudah ada segala macam 'mega', namun sehingga ke hari ini, isu-isu utama seperti perpaduan nasional,rasuah, pemerintahan yang tidak adil dan tidak bersih, kemiskinan rakyat dan jenayah masih belum ada penyelesaiannya.

Rumah siap, pahat berbunyi. Kami berpendapat pastinya ada 'missing piece of jigsaw puzzle'.

Rupa-rupanya kami mendapati kehebatan Tok Guru ialah pada politikbeliau yang juga merupakan ibadah kepada Allah swt. Tiada pengasingan antara keduanya.

Ucapan-ucapan pembangunan dan kesatuan kepada kami sebagai rakyat tidak pernah lari daripada peringatan persiapan akhirat. Tun mencanangkan 'Wawasan 2020', namun Tok Guru mendidik kami lebih daripada itu, iaitu 'Wawasan Akhirat'.

Inilah wawasan yang jelas dan lengkap, yang memberikan kami kejayaan dunia dan akhirat. Hari esok belum pasti bagaimana bentuknya bagi kita, namun mati menjadi satu-satunya perkara yang pasti buat kita semua. Sebab itulah setelah memerintah, Tok Guru tidak semakin kaya, bahkan rakyat menjadi lebih kaya daripada beliau.

Tun ada membangkitkan persoalan pengharaman arak di dalam majlis rasmi kerajaan. Kami merasakan tidak perlu Tun selak satu persatu 'kejayaan' nasionalis zaman lalu, cukup sekadar jika Tun menjawab mengapa ada di kalangan pemimpin negara yang masih bergelumang dengan arak pada hari ini?

Kami musykil mengapakah masih ada para teknokrat Melayu Muslim yang masih 'setia' dengan arak pada hari ini? Kami keliru mengapakah masih ada teknokrat Melayu Muslim yang tanpa segan silu mengetuai syarikat-syarikat dan perusahaan judi yang masyhur seantero Asia Tenggara?


Jika Tun benar-benar ikhlas kepada seruan persaudaraan sesama Muslim, mengapakah setelah kami, rakyat, mengundi pemimpin secara sah di dalam pilihanraya, secara tiba-tiba dilantik dan 'ditauliahkan' JKKK Persekutuan di negeri-negeri yang tidak diperintah Barisan Nasional?

Sewaktu berlakunya tragedi Sauk pada 2001, mengapakah Tun gagal memimpin semua pihak untuk duduk semeja, berdiskusi bagi memperoleh cara terbaik menangani isu keselamatan nasional pada ketika itu?

Sebaliknya beduk perbezaan terus dipalu dan pemimpin parti Islam dituduh bersubahat. Pada ketika Islam dituduh sebagai pengganas di Amerika dan seluruh dunia, Tun menambah api kemarahan masyarakat dunia kepada agama Islam kita.

Adakah ini seruan yang wajar daripada pemimpin utama negara?

Bahkan Barrack Obama yang usianya separuh daripada usia Tun komited mengajak Democrat dan Republican untuk sama-sama menghadapi cabaran nasional yang lebih besar, namun semangat jiwa besar ini gagal Tun jadikan contoh tauladan kepada pengganti Tun.

Antara 'tragedi' terbesar Tun sewaktu menjadi Perdana Menteri ialah dasar Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris pada 2002, yang akan dimansuhkan sepenuhnya pada tahun hadapan. Kami di luar negara meggunakan medium bahasa Inggeris, namun kami dukacita melihat nasib bahasa kita ini.

Analoginya, bahasa Melayu kini ibarat peminta sedekah yang hidup melarat di kampung sendiri. Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan kerajaan hari ini kini acuh tidak acuh dengan mepertahankan keutuhan bahasa kita, kerana sibuk dengan politik dalaman dan mempertahankan kedudukan Uumno yang semakin rapuh.

Buktinya jelas nyata daripada iklan-iklan di jalan raya, kaca televisyen, drama-drama tempatan dan sebagainya. Rakyat pula ditanam dengan pemikiran 'dengan bahasa kebangsaan, anda tidak mampu maju'.

Bahasalah yang menjadi jiwa bangsa Malaysia. Barangkali Allahyarham Tan Sri Dol Ramli ingin menyuarakan pendapat yang sama, namun lidahnya kelu di hujung usia.

Persoalan bahasa Melayu bukan tanda kami ini pro-Melayu atau anti mana-mana kaum, bahkan inilah tanda kami cintakan perpaduan dan mahukan keharmonian negara. Kami mahukan bahasa sepunya yang mampu menjadi menyatukan kami di dalam komunikasi dan percakapan seharian diperkukuh, namun jelas sekali bahasa Melayu semakin rapuh.

Ini berbeza dengan pendekatan Tok Guru yang benar-benar membawa Islam. Walaupun Kelantan bukanlah negeri yang paling kaya, namun negeri Kelantan telah diiktiraf oleh SPRM yang tahap rasuahnya amat kecil. Lain ceritanya dengan barisan kabinet Tun yang sehingga ke hari ini masih dibicarakan dengan tuduhan rasuah.

Walaupun dilemparkan dengan pelbagai tohmahan dan fitnah melalui media-media pro-Tun dan rakan-rakan, namun Tok Guru terus menjadi titik penyatuan masyarakat berbilang kaum di Kelantan dan seluruh negara.

Serban Tok Guru beliau tidak menambah ketakutan kaum India, Melayu dan Cina, bahkan bertambah kasih dan yakin dengan pemerintahan yang bersih dan cekap yang ditunjukkan Tok Guru.

Tun mengilhamkan slogan 'Bersih, Cekap, Amanah', namun Tok Guru lah yang berjaya merealisasikan slogan ini dalam bentuk praktikal di dalam kepimpinan beliau.

Dulunya Tun pernah berkata Rasulullah menyimpan janggut kerana tiada pisau cukur pada zaman tersebut, namun hakikatnya janggut sejemput Tok Guru tidak menjadi penghalang kepada kepimpinan yang adil untuk semua kaum dan agama, dan kami dapat hidup dengan harmoni. Lantas selayaknya Tok Guru digelar Bapa Perpaduan sebenar pada abad ini, kerana kekuatan beliau bukan pada slogan, tapi beliau berjaya untuk 'walked the talk'.

Akhir kata, sebagai anak muda, kami berharapkan agar Tun menyahut seruan Tok Guru Nik Aziz agar menggunakan kebijaksanaan Tun untuk Islam. Apabila Islam ditegakkan, semua kaum dan agama boleh hidup harmoni dan bahagia tanpa sengketa, kerana Islam itu adil untuk semua.

Anggaplah ini sebagai nasihat daripada si adik yang ikhlas mahukan kebaikan buat si abang, lantas kami cucu-cucu yang sedang membesar ini dapat menjadikannya sebagai suri tauladan dalam mewarisi pemerintahan negara yang kita cintai.

Kami sayang Tun dan Tok Guru. Semoga Allah memanjangkan usia Tun dan Tok Guru, untuk menyumbang kepada Isla